linux-kernel - Re: Possible dual license for rbtree ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <7942D912-11CC-4F1E-9088-36031BB52118@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 16 Apr 2023 13:28:28 +0200
From:   Daniel Diaz <didou.diaz@...il.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Possible dual license for rbtree ?

> This comes down to modyfy the SPDX descriptions of lib/rbtree.c and include/rbtree.h, include/rbtree_augmented.h, include/rbtree_types.h as follows:

I juste realized there were 2 versions of rbtree (not dispatched exactly in same header files). The rbtree version that could be made more widely usable by a licence extension is in the tools directory and the associated source files are: tools/lib/rbtree.c, tools/include/linux/rbtree.h and tools/include/linux/rbtree_augmented.h.

Daniel