[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <168177346834.4012366.5864006914556584984.b4-ty@sntech.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 01:18:04 +0200
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
kernel@...labora.com, Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@...k-chips.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Jagan Teki <jagan@...eble.ai>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCHv2 0/2] Improve RK3588 clocks and power domains support
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 21:32:48 +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> After this patchset the power-domain support for RK3588 is basically on par
> with the downstream implementation. More importantly the clock controller
> change unblocks support for any IP blocks using linked clocks. The clock
> controller change must be applied before the power-domain change to avoid
> accessing unclocked registers.
>
> Changes since PATCHv1:
> * https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230331163058.5688-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com/
> * Replace dsb(sy) with wmb() to fix COMPILE_TEST build on !arm64; direct replacement
> would be mb(), but write memory barrier should be enough here as far as I can tell
> * Added Tested-by from Vincent Legoll
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/2] clk: rockchip: rk3588: make gate linked clocks ignore unused
commit: 64042c28c3bb6729df8e2fda89bc7ebbe3790907
Best regards,
--
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists