[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <168208174581.198917.16324073084344740692.b4-ty@sntech.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 14:56:23 +0200
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@...k-chips.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
kernel@...labora.com, Jagan Teki <jagan@...eble.ai>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>,
Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCHv2 0/2] Improve RK3588 clocks and power domains support
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 21:32:48 +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> After this patchset the power-domain support for RK3588 is basically on par
> with the downstream implementation. More importantly the clock controller
> change unblocks support for any IP blocks using linked clocks. The clock
> controller change must be applied before the power-domain change to avoid
> accessing unclocked registers.
>
> Changes since PATCHv1:
> * https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230331163058.5688-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com/
> * Replace dsb(sy) with wmb() to fix COMPILE_TEST build on !arm64; direct replacement
> would be mb(), but write memory barrier should be enough here as far as I can tell
> * Added Tested-by from Vincent Legoll
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[2/2] soc: rockchip: power-domain: add rk3588 mem module support
commit: 632a6b6593d5bfe9932490f8483195bbf50cbbb7
For 6.5, so this will get a rebase after 6.4-rc1.
Best regards,
--
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists