linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Add vendor agnostic mechanism to report hardware sleep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0h9YnitXBZK0SweMtAeaeDcb=mg_PinJfsG5Oc4dCxyMw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Apr 2023 13:42:31 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc:     Box David E <david.e.box@...el.com>, jstultz@...gle.com,
        pavel@....cz, svenva@...omium.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com,
        rrangel@...omium.org, Jain Rajat <rajatja@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Add vendor agnostic mechanism to report hardware sleep

On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 10:25 AM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Mario, et al.,
>
> On 4/14/23 03:23, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> > An important part of validating that s0ix worked properly is to check how
> > much of a cycle was spent in a hardware sleep state.
> >
> > The reporting of hardware sleep is a mix of kernel messages and sysfs
> > files that vary from vendor to vendor. Collecting this information
> > requires extra information on the kernel command line or fetching from
> > debugfs.
> >
> > To make this information more readily accessible introduce a new file in
> > suspend_stats that drivers can report into during their resume routine.
> >
> > Userspace can fetch this information and compare it against the duration
> > of the cycle to allow determining residency percentages and flagging
> > problems.
> >
> > Mario Limonciello (4):
> >   PM: Add sysfs files to represent time spent in hardware sleep state
> >   platform/x86/amd: pmc: Report duration of time in hw sleep state
> >   platform/x86/intel/pmc: core: Always capture counters on suspend
> >   platform/x86/intel/pmc: core: Report duration of time in HW sleep
> >     state
> >
> >  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-power | 29 +++++++++++++
> >  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmc.c        |  6 +--
> >  drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c | 17 ++++----
> >  drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.h |  4 +-
> >  include/linux/suspend.h               |  8 ++++
> >  kernel/power/main.c                   | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  6 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> > base-commit: 09a9639e56c01c7a00d6c0ca63f4c7c41abe075d
>
> Thank you for working on this, this looks good to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>
> For the series. Since this also touches kernel/power/main.c
> I think it would be best if the entire series is merged
> through the linux-pm tree and I'm fine with the pdx86 bits
> also getting merged through linux-pm.
>
> Rafael ?

That would be fine with me, but I've only got the [1/4].

Mario, can you please resend the series with CCs to linux-pm and with
R-by from Hans?