[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230417114425.GA434718@unreal>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 14:44:25 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Wangyang Guo <wangyang.guo@...el.com>,
Arjan van De Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V3 0/4] net, refcount: Address dst_entry reference count
scalability issues
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 09:55:27PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This is version 3 of this series. Version 2 can be found here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230307125358.772287565@linutronix.de
Hi,
I want to raise your attention to this bug report from Intel.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/202304162125.18b7bcdd-oliver.sang@intel.com/
We (Nvidia) are experiencing similar failures in our regressions too.
Revert of last two patches [1] from this series removed the panics, but
didn't add confidence due to another (???) netdev failure:
[ +10.080020] unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth3 to become free. Usage count = 2
Thanks
[1]
bc9d3a9f2afc net: dst: Switch to rcuref_t reference counting
d288a162dd1c net: dst: Prevent false sharing vs. dst_entry:: __refcnt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists