[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230418212746.7db8096e@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 21:27:46 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v7 00/16] net: Add basic LED support for
switch/phy
On Mon, 17 Apr 2023 17:17:22 +0200 Christian Marangi wrote:
> This is a continue of [1]. It was decided to take a more gradual
> approach to implement LEDs support for switch and phy starting with
> basic support and then implementing the hw control part when we have all
> the prereq done.
>
> This series implements only the brightness_set() and blink_set() ops.
> An example of switch implementation is done with qca8k.
>
> For PHY a more generic approach is used with implementing the LED
> support in PHY core and with the user (in this case marvell) adding all
> the required functions.
>
> Currently we set the default-state as "keep" to not change the default
> configuration of the declared LEDs since almost every switch have a
> default configuration.
IIRC we were supposed to take these via netdev with acks from Pavel/Lee.
So we need acks on patches 4/5/16 ? If there is a repost, could you
take out the arch/arm patches? They should not go via netdev, we'll try
to filter them out when applying but mistakes happen.
--
pw-bot: need-ack
Powered by blists - more mailing lists