[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <36f37a18-0022-0368-bf7c-ebdd724b1558@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 10:14:01 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@...sung.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Andi Shyti <andi@...zian.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chanho Park <chanho61.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] spi: s3c64xx: add cpu_relax in polling loop
On 19/04/2023 08:06, Jaewon Kim wrote:
> Adds cpu_relax() to prevent long busy-wait.
How cpu_relax prevents long waiting?
> There is busy-wait loop to check data transfer completion in polling mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
> index 273aa02322d9..886722fb40ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
> @@ -568,6 +568,7 @@ static int s3c64xx_wait_for_pio(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd,
>
> val = msecs_to_loops(ms);
> do {
> + cpu_relax();
Shouldn't this be just readl_poll_timeout()? Or the syntax would be too
complicated?
> status = readl(regs + S3C64XX_SPI_STATUS);
> } while (RX_FIFO_LVL(status, sdd) < xfer->len && --val);
>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists