[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fxph57xh3waxv7fpjnmgai4krpgrdxf3bmp2b3vbpgqbmkcy6u@ib3ds6idhgwz>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 23:51:35 +0200
From: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Adam Skladowski <a39.skl@...il.com>,
Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Rajesh Yadav <ryadav@...eaurora.org>,
Jeykumar Sankaran <jsanka@...eaurora.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Chandan Uddaraju <chandanu@...eaurora.org>,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>,
Jami Kettunen <jami.kettunen@...ainline.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jordan Crouse <jordan@...micpenguin.net>,
Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
Sravanthi Kollukuduru <skolluku@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/17] drm/msm/dpu: Disable MDP vsync source selection
on DPU 5.0.0 and above
On 2023-04-20 04:03:31, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
[..]
> >>> -static void dpu_hw_setup_vsync_source(struct dpu_hw_mdp *mdp,
> >>> +static void dpu_hw_setup_vsync_source_v1(struct dpu_hw_mdp *mdp,
> >>> struct dpu_vsync_source_cfg *cfg)
> >>
> >> In my opinion _v1 is not really descriptive here. Could you please rename it to dpu_hw_setup_vsync_source_no_vsync_sel() ?
> > v1 refers to the CTL rev 100 a.k.a 1.0.0 a.k.a 1, but that's not
> > yet very well formulated upstream.. if we even need it..
I think v1 just refers to "the first next variant of this function",
similar to how for example Microsoft COM APIs start without a suffix,
then get 1, 2, 3 etc appended as new variants "of the same" trickle in.
> Yeah, but this mdp_top, not the ctl. And for CTL I'd probably rename _v1
> to _active to follow actual feature name.
Correct, I just got lazily inspired by downstream here. There it
switches on SDE_MDP_VSYNC_SEL which is based on DPU >= 5.0.0 as
explained in the patch.
> >> Or maybe rename dpu_hw_setup_vsync_source() to dpu_hw_setup_vsync_source_vsync_sel() and drop _v1 from this function.
Maybe add _and_ in there?
> >>
> >> Up to you.
- Marijn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists