[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3e80d3b3-6c9a-33e6-a768-645be1c68404@189.cn>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 17:31:51 +0800
From: Sui Jingfeng <15330273260@....cn>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Li Yi <liyi@...ngson.cn>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, loongson-kernel@...ts.loongnix.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] drm/fbdev-generic: prohibit potential out-of-bounds
access
Hi,
On 2023/4/20 17:04, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Sui,
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 5:09 AM Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@...ngson.cn> wrote:
>> The fbdev test of IGT may write after EOF, which lead to out-of-bound
>> access for drm drivers hire fbdev-generic. For example, run fbdev test
>> on a x86+ast2400 platform, with 1680x1050 resolution, will cause the
>> linux kernel hang with the following call trace:
>>
>> Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
>> [IGT] fbdev: starting subtest eof
>> Workqueue: events drm_fb_helper_damage_work [drm_kms_helper]
>> [IGT] fbdev: starting subtest nullptr
>>
>> RIP: 0010:memcpy_erms+0xa/0x20
>> RSP: 0018:ffffa17d40167d98 EFLAGS: 00010246
>> RAX: ffffa17d4eb7fa80 RBX: ffffa17d40e0aa80 RCX: 00000000000014c0
>> RDX: 0000000000001a40 RSI: ffffa17d40e0b000 RDI: ffffa17d4eb80000
>> RBP: ffffa17d40167e20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff89522ecff8c0
>> R10: ffffa17d4e4c5000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffa17d4eb7fa80
>> R13: 0000000000001a40 R14: 000000000000041a R15: ffffa17d40167e30
>> FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff895257380000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>> CR2: ffffa17d40e0b000 CR3: 00000001eaeca006 CR4: 00000000001706e0
>> Call Trace:
>> <TASK>
>> ? drm_fbdev_generic_helper_fb_dirty+0x207/0x330 [drm_kms_helper]
>> drm_fb_helper_damage_work+0x8f/0x170 [drm_kms_helper]
>> process_one_work+0x21f/0x430
>> worker_thread+0x4e/0x3c0
>> ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
>> kthread+0xf4/0x120
>> ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
>> ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50
>> </TASK>
>> CR2: ffffa17d40e0b000
>> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>>
>> The is because damage rectangles computed by
>> drm_fb_helper_memory_range_to_clip() function does not guaranteed to be
>> bound in the screen's active display area. Possible reasons are:
>>
>> 1) Buffers are allocated in the granularity of page size, for mmap system
>> call support. The shadow screen buffer consumed by fbdev emulation may
>> also choosed be page size aligned.
>>
>> 2) The DIV_ROUND_UP() used in drm_fb_helper_memory_range_to_clip()
>> will introduce off-by-one error.
>>
>> For example, on a 16KB page size system, in order to store a 1920x1080
>> XRGB framebuffer, we need allocate 507 pages. Unfortunately, the size
>> 1920*1080*4 can not be divided exactly by 16KB.
>>
>> 1920 * 1080 * 4 = 8294400 bytes
>> 506 * 16 * 1024 = 8290304 bytes
>> 507 * 16 * 1024 = 8306688 bytes
>>
>> line_length = 1920*4 = 7680 bytes
>>
>> 507 * 16 * 1024 / 7680 = 1081.6
>>
>> off / line_length = 507 * 16 * 1024 / 7680 = 1081
>> DIV_ROUND_UP(507 * 16 * 1024, 7680) will yeild 1082
>>
>> memcpy_toio() typically issue the copy line by line, when copy the last
>> line, out-of-bound access will be happen. Because:
>>
>> 1082 * line_length = 1082 * 7680 = 8309760, and 8309760 > 8306688
>>
>> Note that userspace may stil write to the invisiable area if a larger
>> buffer than width x stride is exposed. But it is not a big issue as
>> long as there still have memory resolve the access if not drafting so
>> far.
>>
>> - Also limit the y1 (Daniel)
>> - keep fix patch it to minimal (Daniel)
>> - screen_size is page size aligned because of it need mmap (Thomas)
>> - Adding fixes tag (Thomas)
>>
>> Fixes: aa15c677cc34 ("drm/fb-helper: Fix vertical damage clipping")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@...ngson.cn>
>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
>> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> Thanks for the update! This v5 is completely different from the v3
> I tested before, so keeping my Tested-by is not really appropriate...
Indeed, I will be carefully next time.
> I have retested fbtest with shmob-drm on Armadillo-800-EVA
> (800x480@...6, i.e. 187.5 pages), and fortunately this version still
> works fine, so
> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Thanks a lot.
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists