[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230421123911.3c4b1e3b56781ffdf043ef58@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 12:39:11 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ELF: use __builtin_mul_overflow() more
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 21:54:36 +0300 Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
> __builtin_mul_overflow() can do multiplication and overflow check
> in one line.
>
> --- a/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> +++ b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> @@ -1651,9 +1651,8 @@ static int fill_files_note(struct memelfnote *note, struct coredump_params *cprm
>
> /* *Estimated* file count and total data size needed */
> count = cprm->vma_count;
> - if (count > UINT_MAX / 64)
> + if (__builtin_mul_overflow(count, 64, &size))
> return -EINVAL;
> - size = count * 64;
Huh, what the heck is that ;)
include/linux/overflow.h has check_mul_overflow() for us to use here.
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h uses
#if __has_builtin(__builtin_mul_overflow)
but check_mul_overflow() didn't bother testing for availability.
Probably tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h should just use
check_mul_overflow().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists