[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a7f51d49-cb6a-4066-a58f-2505e29f25e8@p183>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2023 12:45:14 +0300
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ELF: use __builtin_mul_overflow() more
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 12:39:11PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 21:54:36 +0300 Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > __builtin_mul_overflow() can do multiplication and overflow check
> > in one line.
> >
> > --- a/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> > +++ b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> > @@ -1651,9 +1651,8 @@ static int fill_files_note(struct memelfnote *note, struct coredump_params *cprm
> >
> > /* *Estimated* file count and total data size needed */
> > count = cprm->vma_count;
> > - if (count > UINT_MAX / 64)
> > + if (__builtin_mul_overflow(count, 64, &size))
> > return -EINVAL;
> > - size = count * 64;
>
> Huh, what the heck is that ;)
>
>
> include/linux/overflow.h has check_mul_overflow() for us to use here.
Oh, no, wrappers.
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h uses
>
> #if __has_builtin(__builtin_mul_overflow)
>
> but check_mul_overflow() didn't bother testing for availability.
gcc 5.1 has __builtin_mul_overflow()
> Probably tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h should just use
> check_mul_overflow().
I don't know, this is userspace stuff.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists