[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0f2af683-07f9-7fc7-a043-ee55e41d65c3@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2023 14:03:33 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@...eaurora.org>,
Rocky Liao <rjliao@...eaurora.org>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Add WCN3988 Bluetooth support for Fairphone 4
On 21.04.2023 16:11, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Just to start with the important part why this is an RFC:
>
> While Bluetooth chip init works totally fine and bluez seems to be
> fairly happy with it, there's a (major) problem with scanning, as shown
> with this bluetoothctl snippet and dmesg snippet:
>
> [bluetooth]# scan on
> Failed to start discovery: org.bluez.Error.InProgress
>
> [ 202.371374] Bluetooth: hci0: Opcode 0x200b failed: -16
>
> This opcode should be the following:
>
> include/net/bluetooth/hci.h:#define HCI_OP_LE_SET_SCAN_PARAM 0x200b
Not a bluetooth expert or anything, but does that thing support
bluetooth LE?
Konrad
>
> Unfortunately trying various existing code branches in the Bluetooth
> driver doesn't show any sign of making this work and I don't really know
> where to look to debug this further.
>
> On the other hand "discoverable on" makes the device show up on other
> devices during scanning , so the RF parts of the Bluetooth chip are
> generally functional for sure.
>
> Any ideas are welcome.
>
> @Bjorn: Patch "arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: add uart1 node" should be fine
> to take regardless the RFC status, I don't think the problem is caused
> there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
> ---
> Luca Weiss (4):
> dt-bindings: net: qualcomm: Add WCN3988
> Bluetooth: btqca: Add WCN3988 support
> arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: add uart1 node
> arm64: dts: qcom: sm7225-fairphone-fp4: Add Bluetooth
>
> .../bindings/net/bluetooth/qualcomm-bluetooth.yaml | 2 +
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6350.dtsi | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm7225-fairphone-fp4.dts | 17 ++++++
> drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c | 13 ++++-
> drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h | 12 ++++-
> drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 12 +++++
> 6 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: cf4c0112a0350cfe8a63b5eb3377e2366f57545b
> change-id: 20230421-fp4-bluetooth-b36a0e87b9c8
>
> Best regards,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists