[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84f8a1d4-a0c6-c618-b3e0-4d0f4d4d5a8d@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2023 20:15:21 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc: Qi Han <hanqi@...o.com>, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: remove unnessary comment in __may_age_extent_tree
On 2023/4/22 3:20, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 04/21, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2023/4/18 14:09, Qi Han wrote:
>>> This comment make no sense and is in the wrong place, so let's
>>> remove it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Qi Han <hanqi@...o.com>
>>> ---
>>> fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 1 -
>>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
>>> index 28b12553f2b3..1f6d7de35794 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
>>> @@ -86,7 +86,6 @@ static bool __may_age_extent_tree(struct inode *inode)
>>> if (!test_opt(sbi, AGE_EXTENT_CACHE))
>>> return false;
>>> - /* don't cache block age info for cold file */
>>> if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_COMPRESSED_FILE))
>>> return false;
>>
>> Should move it here instead of removal?
>>
>> /* don't cache block age info for cold file */
>
> Not worth to comment this, as the code is exactly saying that.
Correct.
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
Thanks,
>
>>
>>> if (file_is_cold(inode))
Powered by blists - more mailing lists