linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 00/14] TPM IRQ fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 23 Apr 2023 17:15:56 +0300
From:   "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>
To:     "Lino Sanfilippo" <LinoSanfilippo@....de>,
        Michael Niewöhner <linux@...ewoehner.de>
Cc:     <peterhuewe@....de>, <jgg@...pe.ca>, <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <jandryuk@...il.com>, <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>,
        <l.sanfilippo@...bus.com>, <lukas@...ner.de>,
        <p.rosenberger@...bus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/14] TPM IRQ fixes

On Sat Apr 22, 2023 at 3:59 AM EEST, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 21.04.23 18:50, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>
> >
> > I tested this with libvirt/QEMU/swtpm and did the following tests:
> >
> > 1. TPM 1.2 suspend/resume.
> > 2. TPM 2.0 kselftest.
> > 3. TPM 2.0 suspend/resume + kselftest.
> >
> > I see no issues so I can pick this for my pull request.
> >
> > Tests were performed on top of v6.3-rc7.
> >
> > For all:
> >
> > Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
> >
> > BR, Jarkko
>
> Thats great, thanks a lot for testing this!

Thanks for the patience! I'm sorry it took so long but at least all the
steps in v11 make perfect sense and I see nothing that would rise red
flags. So we can land this with good confidence I think.

BR, Jarkko