[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d022be08cf911178cfb8182598a1689b050845.camel@mniewoehner.de>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2023 17:36:25 +0200
From: Michael Niewöhner <linux@...ewoehner.de>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>
Cc: peterhuewe@....de, jgg@...pe.ca, stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jandryuk@...il.com, pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de, l.sanfilippo@...bus.com,
lukas@...ner.de, p.rosenberger@...bus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/14] TPM IRQ fixes
On Sun, 2023-04-23 at 17:15 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Sat Apr 22, 2023 at 3:59 AM EEST, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 21.04.23 18:50, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I tested this with libvirt/QEMU/swtpm and did the following tests:
> > >
> > > 1. TPM 1.2 suspend/resume.
> > > 2. TPM 2.0 kselftest.
> > > 3. TPM 2.0 suspend/resume + kselftest.
> > >
> > > I see no issues so I can pick this for my pull request.
> > >
> > > Tests were performed on top of v6.3-rc7.
> > >
> > > For all:
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
> > >
> > > BR, Jarkko
> >
> > Thats great, thanks a lot for testing this!
>
> Thanks for the patience! I'm sorry it took so long but at least all the
> steps in v11 make perfect sense and I see nothing that would rise red
> flags. So we can land this with good confidence I think.
>
> BR, Jarkko
I wonder, if it makes sense to submit this patch series to longterm and/or at
least stable?
BR Michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists