linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 00/14] TPM IRQ fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 23 Apr 2023 17:36:25 +0200
From:   Michael Niewöhner <linux@...ewoehner.de>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>
Cc:     peterhuewe@....de, jgg@...pe.ca, stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jandryuk@...il.com, pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de, l.sanfilippo@...bus.com,
        lukas@...ner.de, p.rosenberger@...bus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/14] TPM IRQ fixes

On Sun, 2023-04-23 at 17:15 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Sat Apr 22, 2023 at 3:59 AM EEST, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 21.04.23 18:50, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > I tested this with libvirt/QEMU/swtpm and did the following tests:
> > > 
> > > 1. TPM 1.2 suspend/resume.
> > > 2. TPM 2.0 kselftest.
> > > 3. TPM 2.0 suspend/resume + kselftest.
> > > 
> > > I see no issues so I can pick this for my pull request.
> > > 
> > > Tests were performed on top of v6.3-rc7.
> > > 
> > > For all:
> > > 
> > > Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
> > > 
> > > BR, Jarkko
> > 
> > Thats great, thanks a lot for testing this!
> 
> Thanks for the patience! I'm sorry it took so long but at least all the
> steps in v11 make perfect sense and I see nothing that would rise red
> flags. So we can land this with good confidence I think.
> 
> BR, Jarkko

I wonder, if it makes sense to submit this patch series to longterm and/or at
least stable?

BR Michael