[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZEaWQD_QTs2usVl8@orome>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 16:46:24 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@...dia.com>,
jsnitsel@...hat.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, peterhuewe@....de,
jgg@...pe.ca, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jonathanh@...dia.com, skomatineni@...dia.com, ldewangan@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [Patch V10 2/3] tpm_tis-spi: Add hardware wait polling
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 12:56:25PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 06:08:16PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>
> > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
>
> > Should I pick these patches?
>
> I've queued the spi side already.
Mark,
Would it make sense for you to pick up patch 2/3 as well? As far as I
can tell there's a build dependency on patch 1/3 because of the newly
added SPI_TPM_HW_FLOW symbol.
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists