[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230425102912.qhey7fpbuqvwg44j@CAB-WSD-L081021>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 13:29:12 +0300
From: Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@...rdevices.ru>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
CC: <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
<khilman@...libre.com>, <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
<mturquette@...libre.com>, <vkoul@...nel.org>, <kishon@...nel.org>,
<hminas@...opsys.com>, <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>,
<yue.wang@...ogic.com>, <hanjie.lin@...ogic.com>,
<kernel@...rdevices.ru>, <rockosov@...il.com>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] phy: amlogic: enable/disable clkin during Amlogic
USB PHY init/exit
Hello Martin,
Thanks a lot for the review! Appreciate it!
Please find my comments below.
On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 07:42:25PM +0200, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 1:16 PM Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@...rdevices.ru> wrote:
> >
> > Previously, all Amlogic boards used the XTAL clock as the default board
> > clock for the USB PHY input, so there was no need to enable it.
> > However, with the introduction of new Amlogic SoCs like the A1 family,
> > the USB PHY now uses a gated clock. Hence, it is necessary to enable
> > this gated clock during the PHY initialization sequence, or disable it
> > during the PHY exit, as appropriate.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@...rdevices.ru>
> > ---
> > drivers/phy/amlogic/phy-meson-g12a-usb2.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/phy/amlogic/phy-meson-g12a-usb2.c b/drivers/phy/amlogic/phy-meson-g12a-usb2.c
> > index 9d1efa0d9394..80938751da4f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/phy/amlogic/phy-meson-g12a-usb2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/phy/amlogic/phy-meson-g12a-usb2.c
> > @@ -172,10 +172,16 @@ static int phy_meson_g12a_usb2_init(struct phy *phy)
> > int ret;
> > unsigned int value;
> >
> > - ret = reset_control_reset(priv->reset);
> > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->clk);
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > + ret = reset_control_reset(priv->reset);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> This part looks good. You asked why I suggested this approach instead
> of enabling the clock at probe time and only now I have time to reply
> to it.
> Consider the following scenario:
> - modprobe phy-meson-g12a-usb2
> - modprobe dwc3-meson-g12a (this will call phy_init)
> - rmmod dwc3-meson-g12a (this will call phy_exit)
>
> If the clock was enabled at probe time then it would only be disabled
> when using rmmod phy-meson-g12a-usb2.
> By manually calling clk_prepare_enable/clk_disable_unprepare we ensure
> that the clock gets disabled when we don't need the PHY anymore.
> Whether this makes any difference in terms of power draw: I can't say.
>
It makes sense. I fully agree with your approach, which looks better
compared to using the automatic devm_clk API.
> > udelay(RESET_COMPLETE_TIME);
> >
> > /* usb2_otg_aca_en == 0 */
> > @@ -277,8 +283,11 @@ static int phy_meson_g12a_usb2_init(struct phy *phy)
> > static int phy_meson_g12a_usb2_exit(struct phy *phy)
> > {
> > struct phy_meson_g12a_usb2_priv *priv = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> > + int ret = reset_control_reset(priv->reset);
> > +
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
> >
> > - return reset_control_reset(priv->reset);
> > + return ret;
> I think this can cause issues in case when reset_control_reset returns
> an error: If I understand the code in phy-core.c correctly it will
> only decrease the init ref-count if exit returns 0.
> Whenever phy_exit is called for the second time
> clk_disable_unprepare() will be called with a clock ref-count of 0, so
> it'll likely print some warning.
>
> My suggestion is to return early if reset_control_reset() fails and
> not call clk_disable_unprepare() in that case.
> What do you think?
After taking a closer look at the phy_exit core code, it appears that
your idea is spot on. Exiting immediately when reset fails seems like
the better choice.
I will work on a new version of the code accordingly.
--
Thank you,
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists