linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 10/11] tty: serial: Add Nuvoton ma35d1 serial driver support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46933536-2999-c3b0-f3d3-60e8830f50a6@wanadoo.fr>
Date:   Tue, 25 Apr 2023 12:38:21 +0200
From:   Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To:     Jacky Huang <ychuang570808@...il.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, lee@...nel.org,
        mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org,
        tmaimon77@...il.com, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de, schung@...oton.com,
        mjchen@...oton.com, Jacky Huang <ychuang3@...oton.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/11] tty: serial: Add Nuvoton ma35d1 serial driver
 support

Le 25/04/2023 à 12:24, Jacky Huang a écrit :
> From: Jacky Huang <ychuang3@...oton.com>
> 
> This adds UART and console driver for Nuvoton ma35d1 Soc.
> It supports full-duplex communication, FIFO control, and
> hardware flow control.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jacky Huang <ychuang3@...oton.com>
> ---
>   drivers/tty/serial/Kconfig         |  18 +
>   drivers/tty/serial/Makefile        |   1 +
>   drivers/tty/serial/ma35d1_serial.c | 781 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 800 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 drivers/tty/serial/ma35d1_serial.c
> 

[...]

> +static int ma35d1serial_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct resource *res_mem;
> +	struct uart_ma35d1_port *up;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	struct clk *clk;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
> +		ret = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "serial");
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get alias/pdev id, errno %d\n", ret);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	up = &ma35d1serial_ports[ret];
> +	up->port.line = ret;
> +	res_mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +	if (!res_mem)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	up->port.iobase = res_mem->start;
> +	up->port.membase = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, up->port.iobase, UART_REG_SIZE);
> +	up->port.ops = &ma35d1serial_ops;
> +
> +	spin_lock_init(&up->port.lock);
> +
> +	clk = of_clk_get(pdev->dev.of_node, 0);

Does this...

> +	if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
> +		err = PTR_ERR(clk);
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get core clk: %d\n", err);
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +	}
> +
> +	err = clk_prepare_enable(clk);

... and this be undone in the remove function?

CJ

> +	if (err)
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +
> +	if (up->port.line != 0)
> +		up->port.uartclk = clk_get_rate(clk);
> +
> +	ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +	up->port.irq = ret;
> +	up->port.dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	up->port.flags = UPF_BOOT_AUTOCONF;
> +
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, up);
> +
> +	return uart_add_one_port(&ma35d1serial_reg, &up->port);
> +}

[...]