[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+_b7DK1s87y-_-D3sQxteqJ+78uvKza-vgWGv9SmGm-tqz7DA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 14:14:52 +0100
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
To: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
Cc: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...nel.org>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@...debyte.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
v9fs@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/9p: Fix a datatype used with V9FS_DIRECT_IO
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 8:12 AM Dominique Martinet
<asmadeus@...ewreck.org> wrote:
>
> Christophe JAILLET wrote on Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 08:47:27AM +0200:
> > Fixes: 6deffc8924b5 ("fs/9p: Add new mount modes")
>
> (Not a problem per se: but note this commit hasn't been merged yet, so
> using commit IDs is a bit dangerous. Might want to remark this in the
> free comment section so Eric pays attention to not break that when applying)
This is fine.
The hash is constant unless Eric does a rebase. When a maintainer rebases
then updating the fixes tags is just part of the process. Often they end up
folding the fix into the original patch at that point so the Fixes tag is not
required. If a maintainer doesn't update the tags then the linux-next
maintainers
will notice and complain.
#GitMagic
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists