linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mailbox: pcc: Support platform notification for type4 and shared interrupt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d4207f8b-a631-a2fc-5722-86a103ad2a8e@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Apr 2023 21:22:48 +0800
From:   "lihuisong (C)" <lihuisong@...wei.com>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Robbie King <robbiek@...ghtlabs.com>
CC:     "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        "rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        "wanghuiqiang@...wei.com" <wanghuiqiang@...wei.com>,
        "zhangzekun11@...wei.com" <zhangzekun11@...wei.com>,
        "wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com" <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>,
        "tanxiaofei@...wei.com" <tanxiaofei@...wei.com>,
        "guohanjun@...wei.com" <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
        "xiexiuqi@...wei.com" <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>,
        "wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com" <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
        "huangdaode@...wei.com" <huangdaode@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mailbox: pcc: Support platform notification for
 type4 and shared interrupt


在 2023/4/21 18:55, Sudeep Holla 写道:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 10:21:54AM +0800, lihuisong (C) wrote:
>> 在 2023/4/14 21:48, Robbie King 写道:
>>> Sorry for the delay.  I ran my simple stress test against the patch set and
>>> saw no issues.  For the record it is by no means a thorough regression, but it
>>> has illuminated issues in the past.
>> Thanks for your testing.
>>> The test itself uses a "heartbeat" module in the SCP firmware that generates
>>> notifications at a programmable interval.  The stress test is simply generating
>>> these heartbeats (SCP to AP notifications) while also generating protocol version
>>> queries (AP to SCP).  The notifications are sequence numbered to verify none are
>>> lost, however SCP to AP notification support does not support SCP generating
>>> notifications faster than the AP can process them, so the heartbeat rate must be
>>> reasonably slow (on the order of 10s of millliseconds).
>> I understand your concern. I think this doesn't get int the way of what we
>> are doing.
>>
>> My stress tests were also run in type3 and type4 concurrent scenarios.
>> There were two drivers using type3 to send command looply on platform.
>> In the firmware terminal window,
>> there were two channels for type4 to generate notifications from platform at
>> the 1ms(even shorter) interval.
>> I didn't find anything issues in this stress after running a couple of
>> hours.
>>
>> @Robbie King and @Sudeep, what do you think of my test?
>>
> IMO if there is a need to have this driver changes upstream, then it is good
> enough test as it is the best that can be done at this time. We can always fix
> the bugs or extend to new use-cases in the future.
>
> Since it is merge window next week, it is quite late now. But sometimes
> Rafael picks up additional patches late. So please post v3 even if there
> are no changes with my reviewed-by and Robbie's tested-by so that I can ask
> Rafael to pick it up.
Hi Robbie and Sudeep,

v3 has been sent.
Can you take a look at this series again?
Looking forward to your reply.
>