[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5ba79220-683f-a78a-8c3b-bc0b118226f8@loongson.cn>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 21:25:26 +0800
From: maobibo <maobibo@...ngson.cn>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Loongson (and other $ARCHs?) idle VS timer enqueue
在 2023/4/25 19:49, Peter Zijlstra 写道:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 09:52:49PM +0800, bibo, mao wrote:
>
>>> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(handle_vint)
>>> ori t0, t0, 0x1f
>>> xori t0, t0, 0x1f
>>> bne t0, t1, 1f
>>> + addi.d t0, t0, 0x20
>> It is more reasonable with this patch, this will jump out of idle function
>> directly after interrupt returns. If so, can we remove checking
>> _TIF_NEED_RESCHED in idle ASM function?
>>
>>> + move t0, CSR_CRMD_IE
>>> + csrxchg t0, t0, LOONGARCH_CSR_CRMD
>> - LONG_L t0, tp, TI_FLAGS
>> + nop
>>> nop
>> - andi t0, t0, _TIF_NEED_RESCHED
>> - bnez t0, 1f
>> + nop
>> + nop
>>> nop
>>> - nop
>>> - nop
>>> idle 0
>
> Would not something like the below be a more compact form?
> That is; afaict there is no reason to keep it 32 bytes, we can easily go
> 16 and drop 4 nops.
>
> Additionally, instead of truncating to the start, increase to the end by
> doing:
>
> ip |= 0xf;
> ip++;
>
> Also; I added a wee comment.
Excellent, you are so smart, I test the patch, it works.
>
>
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/genex.S b/arch/loongarch/kernel/genex.S
> index 44ff1ff64260..3c8a6bab98fe 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/genex.S
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/genex.S
> @@ -18,27 +18,31 @@
>
> .align 5
> SYM_FUNC_START(__arch_cpu_idle)
> - /* start of rollback region */
> - LONG_L t0, tp, TI_FLAGS
> - nop
> - andi t0, t0, _TIF_NEED_RESCHED
> - bnez t0, 1f
> - nop
> - nop
> - nop
> + /* start of idle interrupt region */
> + move t0, CSR_CRMD_IE
addi.d t0, zero, CSR_CRMD_IE can be used here, move is used for reg to reg
> + csrxchg t0, t0, LOONGARCH_CSR_CRMD
> + /*
> + * If an interrupt lands here; between enabling interrupts above and
> + * going idle on the next instruction, we must *NOT* go idle since the
> + * interrupt could have set TIF_NEED_RESCHED or caused an timer to need
> + * reprogramming. Fall through -- see handle_vint() below -- and have
> + * the idle loop take care of things.
> + */
> idle 0
> - /* end of rollback region */
> -1: jr ra
> + nop
> + /* end of idle interrupt region */
> +SYM_INNER_LBEL(__arch_cpu_idle_exit, SYM_L_LOCAL)
typo SYM_INNER_LABEL
otherwise LGTM
Tested-by: Bibo, Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>
> + jr ra
> SYM_FUNC_END(__arch_cpu_idle)
>
> SYM_FUNC_START(handle_vint)
> BACKUP_T0T1
> SAVE_ALL
> - la_abs t1, __arch_cpu_idle
> + la_abs t1, __arch_cpu_idle_exit
> LONG_L t0, sp, PT_ERA
> - /* 32 byte rollback region */
> - ori t0, t0, 0x1f
> - xori t0, t0, 0x1f
> + /* 16 byte idle interrupt region */
> + ori t0, t0, 0x0f
> + addi.d t0, t0, 1
> bne t0, t1, 1f
> LONG_S t0, sp, PT_ERA
> 1: move a0, sp
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/idle.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/idle.c
> index 0b5dd2faeb90..5ba72d229920 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/idle.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/idle.c
> @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@
>
> void __cpuidle arch_cpu_idle(void)
> {
> - raw_local_irq_enable();
> __arch_cpu_idle(); /* idle instruction needs irq enabled */
> raw_local_irq_disable();
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists