linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] net: phy: add driver for MediaTek SoC built-in GE PHYs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230425072404.28b798e1@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 25 Apr 2023 07:24:04 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Qingfang Deng <dqfext@...il.com>,
        SkyLake Huang <SkyLake.Huang@...iatek.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: phy: add driver for MediaTek SoC built-in GE
 PHYs

On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 09:27:56 +0100 Daniel Golle wrote:
> > Daniel, is it high prio for you to get it into 6.4 or 6.5 is okay?  
> 
> No rush, as this is mostly relevant for OpenWrt the thing which matters
> most to me is having it in the next LTS kernel, so 6.5 should still be
> fine I suppose.
> 
> > 
> > I'm trying to get a read on whether we should merge it because it's 
> > kind of on the goal line for this merge window. 
> > 
> > If nobody feels strongly we can do this the traditional way - I'll 
> > just complain about RCT, hence kicking it back out into the field :)  
> 
> I understand Andrew's concerns and will resubmit for the next merge
> window in 2 weeks, and without the LED part for now until PHY LED
> infrastructure is more ready (ie. able to offload 'netdev' trigger
> to hardware)

Perfect, thanks!