[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230425132028.7d16e04c@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 13:20:28 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
Cc: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>, corbet@....net,
shuah@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tracing 0/3] tracing: support > 8 byte filter predicates
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 18:15:03 +0100
Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com> wrote:
> that's a great idea; what would be the most consistent ftrace syntax
> for this do you think? I noticed that hist triggers append a modifier
> to the field name so would something like
>
> "dst.ipv6 == ::1"
Yeah, I think just having ":" in the name without quotes can help the filter
know that it's a ipv6 id.
Hmm, although we may want to do the same for mac addresses. But we can
determine the difference by the field size. If it's 6 bytes, it's a mac, if
it's 128 bits, then ipv6.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists