[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57d8f27c-7737-8af9-490b-a33b2783fc9f@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 09:51:00 +0100
From: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>, corbet@....net,
shuah@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tracing 0/3] tracing: support > 8 byte filter predicates
On 25/04/2023 18:20, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 18:15:03 +0100
> Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com> wrote:
>
>> that's a great idea; what would be the most consistent ftrace syntax
>> for this do you think? I noticed that hist triggers append a modifier
>> to the field name so would something like
>>
>> "dst.ipv6 == ::1"
>
> Yeah, I think just having ":" in the name without quotes can help the filter
> know that it's a ipv6 id.
>
> Hmm, although we may want to do the same for mac addresses. But we can
> determine the difference by the field size. If it's 6 bytes, it's a mac, if
> it's 128 bits, then ipv6.
>
good idea! so what about the following
- 16 byte field with ':'; convert from IPv6 address before memcmp()ing
- 6 byte field with ':'; convert from MAC address before memcmp()ing
- 4 byte field with '.'; convert from IPv4 address before memcmp()ing
- 0x prefix, any other size; basic memcmp
? Thanks!
Alan
> -- Steve
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists