[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZEjnHjBWM0YwS0t5@alley>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 10:55:58 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] printk: Do not delay messages which aren't
solicited by any console
On Tue 2023-04-25 14:06:22, Chris Down wrote:
> Boot-delayed printk messages already have this checked up front, and
> it's odd that we don't do the same check for global printk delays, since
> there's no reason to delay if we are not going to emit anything.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>
Great catch!
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists