[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <52dd950a-e714-4ebe-a663-4e0ec6463d03@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 08:40:51 +0100
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Stanislav Kinsburskii" <skinsburskii@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc: "Matt Turner" <mattst88@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"Stanislav Kinsburskii" <stanislav.kinsburskii@...il.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@...en8.de>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Brian Cain" <bcain@...cinc.com>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"Jiaxun Yang" <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Omar Sandoval" <osandov@...com>, "Helge Deller" <deller@....de>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org,
"Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
"Ivan Kokshaysky" <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"Chris Down" <chris@...isdown.name>,
"Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@...il.com>,
"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Expect immutable pointer in virt_to_phys/isa_virt_to_bus
prototypes
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023, at 12:17, Stanislav Kinsburskii wrote:
> This series is aimed to address compilation warnings when a constant pointer
> is passed to virt_to_phys and isa_virt_to_bus functions:
>
> warning: passing argument 1 of ‘virt_to_phys’ discards ‘const’
> qualifier from pointer target type
> warning: passing argument 1 of ‘isa_virt_to_bus’ discards ‘const’
> qualifier from pointer target type
>
> The change(s) is the same for all architectures, but it's split into a series on
> per-arch basis to simplify applying and testing on the maintainers side.
>
Looks all good to me. If everyone is happy with it, I'll queue it up
after in the asm-generic tree for 6.5, once rc1 is out.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists