lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 29 Apr 2023 16:24:34 +0200
From:   "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To:     "Tom Rix" <trix@...hat.com>,
        "Michael Ellerman" <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        "Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@...il.com>,
        "Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc:     linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: remove unneeded if-checks

On Sat, Apr 29, 2023, at 00:12, Tom Rix wrote:
> For ppc64, gcc with W=1 reports
> arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_base.c:330:17: error:
>   suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body]
>   330 |                 ;
>       |                 ^
> arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_base.c:333:17: error:
>   suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body]
>   333 |                 ;
>       |                 ^
>
> These if-checks do not do anything so remove them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>

The original intention was to document that there are other
flags that could be handled here, but clearly nobody is adding
code to spufs, so there is no point in keeping that.

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ