[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYGWZSk+wSW7waFsY0wSS+CasEqm4N0CU6u6UKxe9WA6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 14:29:34 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/38] gpio: add HAS_IOPORT dependencies
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 4:45 PM Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Makes sense I changed it to the above approach for v4. One thing this
> makes me wonder is if then one should change the X86 dependency to at
> least X86 || COMPILE_TEST or even remove it and rely on HAS_IOPORT.
Hm it makes sense I think. I don't know if there may be other
X86 deps in these drivers but we don't know until we tried.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists