| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 18:30:24 +0200
From: Espen Grindhaug <espen.grindhaug@...il.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@...a.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] libbpf: Improve version handling when attaching uprobe
On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 08:23:35AM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
>
>
> On 5/1/23 6:00 AM, Espen Grindhaug wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 06:19:29PM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/27/23 12:19 PM, Espen Grindhaug wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 02:47:27PM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 4/23/23 11:55 AM, Espen Grindhaug wrote:
> > > > > > This change fixes the handling of versions in elf_find_func_offset.
> > > > > > In the previous implementation, we incorrectly assumed that the
> > > > >
> > > > > Could you give more explanation/example in the commit message
> > > > > what does 'incorrectly' mean here? In which situations the
> > > > > current libbpf implementation will not be correct?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > How about something like this?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > libbpf: Improve version handling when attaching uprobe
> > > >
> > > > This change fixes the handling of versions in elf_find_func_offset.
> > > >
> > > > For example, let's assume we are trying to attach an uprobe to pthread_create in
> > > > glibc. Prior to this commit, it would fail with an error message saying 'elf:
> > > > ambiguous match [...]', this is because there are two entries in the symbol
> > > > table with that name.
> > > >
> > > > $ nm -D /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 | grep pthread_create
> > > > 0000000000094cc0 T pthread_create@...BC_2.2.5
> > > > 0000000000094cc0 T pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.34
> > > >
> > > > So we go ahead and modify our code to attach to 'pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.34',
> > > > and this also fails, but this time with the error 'elf: failed to find symbol
> > > > [...]'. This fails because we incorrectly assumed that the version information
> > > > would be present in the string found in the string table, but there is only the
> > > > string 'pthread_create'.
> > >
> > > I tried one example with my centos8 libpthread library.
> > >
> > > $ llvm-readelf -s /lib64/libc-2.28.so | grep pthread_cond_signal
> > > 39: 0000000000095f70 43 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 14
> > > pthread_cond_signal@@GLIBC_2.3.2
> > > 40: 0000000000096250 43 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 14
> > > pthread_cond_signal@...BC_2.2.5
> > > 3160: 0000000000096250 43 FUNC LOCAL DEFAULT 14
> > > __pthread_cond_signal_2_0
> > > 3589: 0000000000095f70 43 FUNC LOCAL DEFAULT 14
> > > __pthread_cond_signal
> > > 5522: 0000000000095f70 43 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 14
> > > pthread_cond_signal@@GLIBC_2.3.2
> > > 5545: 0000000000096250 43 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 14
> > > pthread_cond_signal@...BC_2.2.5
> > > $ nm -D /lib64/libc-2.28.so | grep pthread_cond_signal
> > > 0000000000095f70 T pthread_cond_signal@@GLIBC_2.3.2
> > > 0000000000096250 T pthread_cond_signal@...BC_2.2.5
> > > $
> > >
> > > Note that two pthread_cond_signal functions have different addresses,
> > > which is expected as they implemented for different versions.
> > >
> > > But in your case,
> > > > $ nm -D /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 | grep pthread_create
> > > > 0000000000094cc0 T pthread_create@...BC_2.2.5
> > > > 0000000000094cc0 T pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.34
> > >
> > > Two functions have the same address which is very weird and I suspect
> > > some issues here at least needs some investigation.
> > >
> >
> > I am no expert on this, but as far as I can tell, this is normal,
> > although much more common on my Ubuntu machine than my Fedora machine.
> >
> > Script to find duplicates:
> >
> > nm -D /usr/lib64/libc-2.33.so | awk '
> > {
> > addr = $1;
> > symbol = $3;
> > sub(/[@].*$/, "", symbol);
> >
> > if (addr == prev_addr && symbol == prev_symbol) {
> > if (prev_symbol_printed == 0) {
> > print prev_line;
> > prev_symbol_printed = 1;
> > }
> > print;
> > } else {
> > prev_symbol_printed = 0;
> > }
> > prev_addr = addr;
> > prev_symbol = symbol;
> > prev_line = $0;
> > }'
> >
> >
> > > Second, for the symbol table, the following is ELF encoding,
> > >
> > > typedef struct {
> > > Elf64_Word st_name;
> > > unsigned char st_info;
> > > unsigned char st_other;
> > > Elf64_Half st_shndx;
> > > Elf64_Addr st_value;
> > > Elf64_Xword st_size;
> > > } Elf64_Sym;
> > >
> > > where
> > > st_name
> > >
> > > An index into the object file's symbol string table, which holds the
> > > character representations of the symbol names. If the value is nonzero, the
> > > value represents a string table index that gives the symbol name. Otherwise,
> > > the symbol table entry has no name.
> > >
> > > So, the function name (including @..., @@...) should be in string table
> > > which is the same for the above two pthread_cond_signal symbols.
> > >
> > > I think it is worthwhile to debug why in your situation
> > > pthread_create@...BC_2.2.5 and pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.34 do not
> > > have them in the string table.
> > >
> >
> > I think you are mistaken here; the strings in the strings table don't contain
> > the version. Take a look at this partial dump of the strings table.
> >
> > $ readelf -W -p .dynstr /usr/lib64/libc-2.33.so
> >
> > String dump of section '.dynstr':
> > [ 1] xdrmem_create
> > [ f] __wctomb_chk
> > [ 1c] getmntent
> > [ 26] __freelocale
> > [ 33] __rawmemchr
> > [ 3f] _IO_vsprintf
> > [ 4c] getutent
> > [ 55] __file_change_detection_for_path
> > (...)
> > [ 350e] memrchr
> > [ 3516] pthread_cond_signal
> > [ 352a] __close
> > (...)
> > [ 61b6] GLIBC_2.2.5
> > [ 61c2] GLIBC_2.2.6
> > [ 61ce] GLIBC_2.3
> > [ 61d8] GLIBC_2.3.2
> > [ 61e4] GLIBC_2.3.3
> >
> > As you can see, the strings have no versions, and the version strings
> > themselves are also in this table as entries at the end of the table.
>
> I see you search .dynstr section. Do you think whether we should
> search .strtab instead since it contains versioned symbols?
>
I searched .dynstr since my libc files only have that section, but I do see
your point. If const char *binary_path points to an executable and not an
.so file, then we would find some versioned symbols in the .strtab section.
However, since libbpf supports using the .so as binary_path, would we not
need the functionality to build the complete name regardless?
Adding a check to not build the full name if it already contains an '@' is
probably a good idea, though.
> >
> > > >
> > > > This patch reworks how we compare the symbol name provided by the user if it is
> > > > qualified with a version (using @ or @@). We now look up the correct version
> > > > string in the version symbol table before constructing the full name, as also
> > > > done above by nm, before comparing.
> > > >
> > > > > > version information would be present in the string found in the
> > > > > > string table.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We now look up the correct version string in the version symbol
> > > > > > table before constructing the full name and then comparing.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This patch adds support for both name@...sion and name@@version to
> > > > > > match output of the various elf parsers.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Espen Grindhaug <espen.grindhaug@...il.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > [...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists