linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] vsprintf: Add %p[mM]U for uppercase MAC address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZFEAq7r-awo0OYzp@alley>
Date:   Tue, 2 May 2023 14:23:07 +0200
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To:     Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc:     Konrad Gräfe <k.graefe@...eware.de>,
        Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...obroma-systems.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@...labora.com>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] vsprintf: Add %p[mM]U for uppercase MAC address

On Fri 2023-04-28 08:56:59, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 27/04/2023 13.51, Konrad Gräfe wrote:
> > The CDC-ECM specification requires an USB gadget to send the host MAC
> > address as uppercase hex string. This change adds the appropriate
> > modifier.
> 
> Thinking more about it, I'm not sure this is appropriate, not for a
> single user like this. vsprintf() should not and cannot satisfy all
> possible string formatting requirements for the whole kernel. The %pX
> extensions are convenient for use with printk() and friends where one
> needs what in other languages would be "string interpolation" (because
> then the caller doesn't need to deal with temporary stack buffers and
> pass them as %s arguments), but for single items like this, snprintf()
> is not necessarily the right tool for the job.
>
> In this case, the caller can just as well call string_upper() on the
> result

I tend to agree with Rasmus. string_upper() is a super-easy solution.
One user does not look worth adding all the churn into vsprintf().

Best Regards,
Petr