linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: qrb4210-rb2: Enable aDSP and cDSP remoteproc nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAA8EJpog9cbB_y4zyeECkXRjOGznEATpztAOYsMx61NgyH3Xqg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 May 2023 15:23:13 +0300
From:   Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc:     Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, agross@...nel.org,
        andersson@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bhupesh.linux@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: qrb4210-rb2: Enable aDSP and
 cDSP remoteproc nodes

On Tue, 2 May 2023 at 14:58, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1.05.2023 12:58, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> > Enable the aDSP and cDSP remoteproc nodes on Qualcomm QRB4210 RB2 board.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb4210-rb2.dts | 10 ++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb4210-rb2.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb4210-rb2.dts
> > index bff6ba1d689f..3ab46499d3fa 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb4210-rb2.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb4210-rb2.dts
> > @@ -34,6 +34,16 @@ &qupv3_id_0 {
> >       status = "okay";
> >  };
> >
> > +&remoteproc_adsp {
> > +     status = "okay";
> > +     firmware-name = "qcom/sm6115/adsp.mdt";
> status last
> also, don't we want to use .mbn (squashed binary)?

Yes, please. Also, just to make sure, are sm6115 and qrb4210 binaries
fully compatible? We already have a mess of sdm845 vs sda845.

>
> Konrad
> > +};
> > +
> > +&remoteproc_cdsp {
> > +     status = "okay";
> > +     firmware-name = "qcom/sm6115/cdsp.mdt";
> > +};
> > +
> >  &rpm_requests {
> >       regulators {
> >               compatible = "qcom,rpm-pm6125-regulators";



-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry