linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/40] lib/string_helpers: Drop space in string_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b6b472b65b76e95bb4c7fc7eac1ee296fdbb64fd.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
Date:   Mon, 01 May 2023 22:22:18 -0400
From:   James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To:     Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...e.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
        hannes@...xchg.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, mgorman@...e.de,
        willy@...radead.org, liam.howlett@...cle.com, corbet@....net,
        void@...ifault.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        ldufour@...ux.ibm.com, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
        arnd@...db.de, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, peterx@...hat.com,
        david@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk, mcgrof@...nel.org,
        masahiroy@...nel.org, nathan@...nel.org, dennis@...nel.org,
        tj@...nel.org, muchun.song@...ux.dev, rppt@...nel.org,
        paulmck@...nel.org, pasha.tatashin@...een.com,
        yosryahmed@...gle.com, yuzhao@...gle.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
        hughd@...gle.com, andreyknvl@...il.com, keescook@...omium.org,
        ndesaulniers@...gle.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        ebiggers@...gle.com, ytcoode@...il.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
        bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com, cl@...ux.com,
        penberg@...nel.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com,
        glider@...gle.com, elver@...gle.com, dvyukov@...gle.com,
        shakeelb@...gle.com, songmuchun@...edance.com, jbaron@...mai.com,
        rientjes@...gle.com, minchan@...gle.com, kaleshsingh@...gle.com,
        kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
        kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Noralf Trï¿½nnes <noralf@...nnes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/40] lib/string_helpers: Drop space in
 string_get_size's output

On Mon, 2023-05-01 at 15:35 -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 11:13:15AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > On Mon, 01 May 2023, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > 
> > > From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
> > > 
> > > Previously, string_get_size() outputted a space between the
> > > number and the units, i.e.
> > >  9.88 MiB
> > > 
> > > This changes it to
> > >  9.88MiB
> > > 
> > > which allows it to be parsed correctly by the 'sort -h' command.
> > 
> > Wouldn't this break users that already parse it the current way?
> 
> It's not impossible - but it's not used in very many places and we
> wouldn't be printing in human-readable units if it was meant to be
> parsed - it's mainly used for debug output currently.

It is not used just for debug.  It's used all over the kernel for
printing out device sizes.  The output mostly goes to the kernel print
buffer, so it's anyone's guess as to what, if any, tools are parsing
it, but the concern about breaking log parsers seems to be a valid one.

> If someone raises a specific objection we'll do something different,
> otherwise I think standardizing on what userspace tooling already
> parses is a good idea.

If you want to omit the space, why not simply add your own variant?  A
string_get_size_nospace() which would use most of the body of this one
as a helper function but give its own snprintf format string at the
end.  It's only a couple of lines longer as a patch and has the bonus
that it definitely wouldn't break anything by altering an existing
output.

James