[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpHfAFx9rjv0gHK77LbP-8gd-kFnWw=aqfQTP6pH=zvMNg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 19:30:13 -0700
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...e.com,
josef@...icpanda.com, jack@...e.cz, ldufour@...ux.ibm.com,
laurent.dufour@...ibm.com, michel@...pinasse.org,
liam.howlett@...cle.com, jglisse@...gle.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
minchan@...gle.com, dave@...olabs.net, punit.agrawal@...edance.com,
lstoakes@...il.com, hdanton@...a.com, apopple@...dia.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: handle swap page faults under VMA lock if page is uncontended
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 7:02 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 10:50:23AM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > +++ b/mm/memory.c
> > @@ -3711,11 +3711,6 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> > if (!pte_unmap_same(vmf))
> > goto out;
> >
> > - if (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK) {
> > - ret = VM_FAULT_RETRY;
> > - goto out;
> > - }
> > -
> > entry = pte_to_swp_entry(vmf->orig_pte);
> > if (unlikely(non_swap_entry(entry))) {
> > if (is_migration_entry(entry)) {
>
> You're missing the necessary fallback in the (!folio) case.
> swap_readpage() is synchronous and will sleep.
True, but is it unsafe to do that under VMA lock and has to be done
under mmap_lock?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists