lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 3 May 2023 08:34:58 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>, amitk@...nel.org,
        thara.gopinath@...il.com, agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org,
        konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, rafael@...nel.org,
        daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, rui.zhang@...el.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] thermal/drivers/tsens: Add IPQ9574 support

On 03/05/2023 06:46, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> From: Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@...cinc.com>
> 
> Qualcomm IPQ9574 uses tsens v2.3.1 IP, which is similar to IPQ8074 tsens.
> Hence reusing the data_ipq8074 for IPQ9574.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> index d321812..e752b7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> @@ -1093,6 +1093,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id tsens_table[] = {
>  		.compatible = "qcom,ipq8074-tsens",
>  		.data = &data_ipq8074,
>  	}, {
> +		.compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-tsens",
> +		.data = &data_ipq8074,

This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my
feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it.
Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all
requested changes or keep discussing them.

Thank you.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ