[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230503140609.e65bdc2b0e55ba6f49bbb620@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 14:06:09 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Cc: Danila Chernetsov <listdansp@...l.ru>,
Anton Altaparmakov <anton@...era.com>,
linux-ntfs-dev@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lvc-project@...uxtesting.org,
Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: ntfs orphan? (was Re: [PATCH] ntfs: do not dereference a null
ctx on error)
On Wed, 3 May 2023 11:16:02 +0700 Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 07:44:33PM +0000, Danila Chernetsov wrote:
> > In ntfs_mft_data_extend_allocation_nolock(), if an error condition occurs
> > prior to 'ctx' being set to a non-NULL value, avoid dereferencing the NULL
> > 'ctx' pointer in error handling.
> >
> > Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>
> Duplicate of 10-years-old outstanding patch at [1].
Well, the patches are actually quite different. Is Danila's longer one
better?
> I'm not speaking of the patch itself but rather on unfortunate state
> of ntfs subsystem. It seems like the maintainer is MIA (has not
> responding to patch submissions for a long time). Some trivial
> patches, however, are merged through mm tree.
>
> Konstantin (from newer ntfs3 subsystem), Andrew, would you like to take a
> look on this orphaned subsystem (and help reviewing)? I'd like to send
> MAINTAINERS update if it turns out to be the case.
>
Sure, I can join linux-ntfs-dev@...ts.sourceforge.net and hendle things
which come along.
Or Christian may want to do that?
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/1358389709-20561-1-git-send-email-nickolai@csail.mit.edu/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists