[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230504160845.2065510-1-james.clark@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 17:08:45 +0100
From: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
To: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] perf: arm64: Fix build with refcount checking
With EXTRA_CFLAGS=-DREFCNT_CHECKING=1 and build-test, some unwrapped
map accesses appear. Wrap it in the new accessor to fix the error:
error: 'struct perf_cpu_map' has no member named 'map'
Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
---
tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/header.c | 4 ++--
tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/header.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/header.c
index d730666ab95d..80b9f6287fe2 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/header.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/header.c
@@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ static int _get_cpuid(char *buf, size_t sz, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus)
char path[PATH_MAX];
FILE *file;
- scnprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "%s/devices/system/cpu/cpu%d"MIDR,
- sysfs, cpus->map[cpu]);
+ scnprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "%s/devices/system/cpu/cpu%d" MIDR,
+ sysfs, RC_CHK_ACCESS(cpus)->map[cpu].cpu);
file = fopen(path, "r");
if (!file) {
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c
index fa143acb4c8d..ef1ed645097c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ static struct perf_pmu *pmu__find_core_pmu(void)
* The cpumap should cover all CPUs. Otherwise, some CPUs may
* not support some events or have different event IDs.
*/
- if (pmu->cpus->nr != cpu__max_cpu().cpu)
+ if (RC_CHK_ACCESS(pmu->cpus)->nr != cpu__max_cpu().cpu)
return NULL;
return pmu;
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists