linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf: arm64: Fix build with refcount checking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAP-5=fX+PB9_UVPxwpHwcesupu_8f2c8bp5KOHrG9WAFH4VBpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 May 2023 09:28:21 -0700
From:   Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To:     James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Cc:     linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: arm64: Fix build with refcount checking

On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 9:09 AM James Clark <james.clark@....com> wrote:
>
> With EXTRA_CFLAGS=-DREFCNT_CHECKING=1 and build-test, some unwrapped
> map accesses appear. Wrap it in the new accessor to fix the error:
>
>   error: 'struct perf_cpu_map' has no member named 'map'
>
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>

Thanks James and sorry for the breakage!
Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>

Ian

> ---
>  tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/header.c | 4 ++--
>  tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c    | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/header.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/header.c
> index d730666ab95d..80b9f6287fe2 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/header.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/header.c
> @@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ static int _get_cpuid(char *buf, size_t sz, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus)
>                 char path[PATH_MAX];
>                 FILE *file;
>
> -               scnprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "%s/devices/system/cpu/cpu%d"MIDR,
> -                               sysfs, cpus->map[cpu]);
> +               scnprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "%s/devices/system/cpu/cpu%d" MIDR,
> +                         sysfs, RC_CHK_ACCESS(cpus)->map[cpu].cpu);
>
>                 file = fopen(path, "r");
>                 if (!file) {
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c
> index fa143acb4c8d..ef1ed645097c 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ static struct perf_pmu *pmu__find_core_pmu(void)
>                  * The cpumap should cover all CPUs. Otherwise, some CPUs may
>                  * not support some events or have different event IDs.
>                  */
> -               if (pmu->cpus->nr != cpu__max_cpu().cpu)
> +               if (RC_CHK_ACCESS(pmu->cpus)->nr != cpu__max_cpu().cpu)
>                         return NULL;
>
>                 return pmu;
> --
> 2.34.1
>