linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] regulator: da9062: Make the use of IRQ optional

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <02349503-4542-cbfd-2a2f-379fe8284cca@denx.de>
Date:   Mon, 8 May 2023 01:40:35 +0200
From:   Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To:     DLG Adam Ward <DLG-Adam.Ward.opensource@...renesas.com>,
        Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@...electronics.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc:     Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        kernel <kernel@...electronics.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] regulator: da9062: Make the use of IRQ optional

On 4/27/23 12:50, DLG Adam Ward wrote:
> On 18 April 2023 21:00, Christoph Niedermaier wrote:
>> In V3 of this patch the kernel test robot found an issue. A fix is important, because otherwise the normal path with IRQ could have problems. So I fixed it in V4. Any comments or is it OK how I fixed it?
> 
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> It looks fine now; sorry I didn't notice before.

I think a formal Reviewed-by / Acked-by would be nice.

But maybe Mark can pick this 3/3 patch now either way ?