[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OS3PR01MB8460C4A6047EE4590D4F791FC2769@OS3PR01MB8460.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 08:59:43 +0000
From: DLG Adam Ward <DLG-Adam.Ward.opensource@...renesas.com>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
DLG Adam Ward <DLG-Adam.Ward.opensource@...renesas.com>,
Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@...electronics.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
kernel <kernel@...electronics.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V4 3/3] regulator: da9062: Make the use of IRQ optional
On 08 May 2023 00:41, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> It looks fine now; sorry I didn't notice before.
>
>I think a formal Reviewed-by / Acked-by would be nice.
It's already there in the patch - obliquely referred to by "before", the apology because I'd missed that which the robot picked up on after I'd looked at it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists