[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e7e4f933-5098-5fea-7a1d-254609c93cbd@denx.de>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 11:20:43 +0200
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: DLG Adam Ward <DLG-Adam.Ward.opensource@...renesas.com>,
Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@...electronics.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc: Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
kernel <kernel@...electronics.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] regulator: da9062: Make the use of IRQ optional
On 5/9/23 10:59, DLG Adam Ward wrote:
> On 08 May 2023 00:41, Marek Vasut wrote:
>
>>> It looks fine now; sorry I didn't notice before.
>>
>> I think a formal Reviewed-by / Acked-by would be nice.
>
> It's already there in the patch - obliquely referred to by "before", the apology because I'd missed that which the robot picked up on after I'd looked at it.
Ahh, in that case, sorry for the noise and thanks for the RB .
And for all its worth, patch is also:
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists