linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH V4 3/3] regulator: da9062: Make the use of IRQ optional

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Jul 2023 13:19:58 +0000
From:   Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@...electronics.com>
To:     Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
        DLG Adam Ward <DLG-Adam.Ward.opensource@...renesas.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
CC:     Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        kernel <kernel@...electronics.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V4 3/3] regulator: da9062: Make the use of IRQ optional

> From: Marek Vasut [mailto:marex@...x.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2023 11:21 AM
> To: DLG Adam Ward <DLG-Adam.Ward.opensource@...renesas.com>; Christoph Niedermaier
> <cniedermaier@...electronics.com>; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Cc: Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>; Liam Girdwood
> <lgirdwood@...il.com>; Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>; kernel <kernel@dh-
> electronics.com>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] regulator: da9062: Make the use of IRQ optional
> 
> ACHTUNG: Diese E-Mail wurde von Extern an Dich gesendet. Bitte klicke deshalb nicht auf
> Links in der E-Mail! Falls das Öffnen erforderlich ist, bitte Links zuvor auf
> Authentizität überprüfen – im Zweifelsfall bitte zuerst bei der IT nachfragen!
> 
> On 5/9/23 10:59, DLG Adam Ward wrote:
> > On 08 May 2023 00:41, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >
> >>> It looks fine now; sorry I didn't notice before.
> >>
> >> I think a formal Reviewed-by / Acked-by would be nice.
> >
> > It's already there in the patch - obliquely referred to by "before", the apology because
> I'd missed that which the robot picked up on after I'd looked at it.
> 
> Ahh, in that case, sorry for the noise and thanks for the RB .
> 
> And for all its worth, patch is also:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>

I was wondering how to continue with this patch. Is there anything against
picking this patch or did I miss it?


Thanks and regards
Christoph