linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH V4 3/3] regulator: da9062: Make the use of IRQ optional

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52f69c31ad674d6698e1a535b29a06ef@dh-electronics.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Jul 2023 09:18:58 +0000
From:   Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@...electronics.com>
To:     Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
        DLG Adam Ward <DLG-Adam.Ward.opensource@...renesas.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
CC:     Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        kernel <kernel@...electronics.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V4 3/3] regulator: da9062: Make the use of IRQ optional

From: Christoph Niedermaier
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2023 3:20 PM
>> On 5/9/23 10:59, DLG Adam Ward wrote:
>>> On 08 May 2023 00:41, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>
>>>>> It looks fine now; sorry I didn't notice before.
>>>>
>>>> I think a formal Reviewed-by / Acked-by would be nice.
>>>
>>> It's already there in the patch - obliquely referred to by "before", the apology because
>> I'd missed that which the robot picked up on after I'd looked at it.
>>
>> Ahh, in that case, sorry for the noise and thanks for the RB .
>>
>> And for all its worth, patch is also:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
> 
> I was wondering how to continue with this patch. Is there anything against
> picking this patch or did I miss it?

To make it easier I will rebase this leftover
patch on the current next and send it as V5.

Regards
Christoph