[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230508-deviator-departed-55af603e50c6@wendy>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 08:01:41 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To: Icenowy Zheng <uwu@...nowy.me>
CC: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
<heiko@...ech.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] riscv: dts: add initial T-HEAD light SoC device tree
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 11:32:17AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> P.S. which one is preferred by DT binding maintainers, the marketing
> name or the codename?
I don't see the benefit of using internal product codenames (even if it
did appear on their gitee) over the name by which it'll appear in board
datasheets etc etc.
Cheers,
Conor.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists