linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] phy: mediatek: fix returning garbage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 8 May 2023 14:27:42 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc:     Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, chunkuang.hu@...nel.org,
        p.zabel@...gutronix.de, chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com,
        kishon@...nel.org, angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com,
        nathan@...nel.org, ndesaulniers@...gle.com, granquet@...libre.com,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: mediatek: fix returning garbage

On 08-05-23, 10:24, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> 
> On 08/05/2023 09:48, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On 05-05-23, 17:37, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 05/05/2023 11:28, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > > On 14-04-23, 08:22, Tom Rix wrote:
> > > > > clang reports
> > > > > drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-hdmi-mt8195.c:298:6: error: variable
> > > > >     'ret' is uninitialized when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
> > > > >           if (ret)
> > > > >               ^~~
> > > > > ret should have been set by the preceding call to mtk_hdmi_pll_set_hw.
> > > > 
> > > > I have applied "phy: mediatek: hdmi: mt8195: fix uninitialized variable
> > > > usage in pll_calc"
> > > 
> > > Thanks Vinod, that was on my list for today as well. I was a bit puzzled
> > > because you took the patch that added it, but I wasn't sure if you would
> > > take the fix. How do you want to handle things like this in the future?
> > 
> > Fixes should be sent as Fixes patch
> > 
> 
> I'm not sure what do you mean. Patch subject includes the word fix and the
> patch has a fixes tag. What was missing here?
> 
> Does this mean you will take fixes for this driver in the future or do you
> want me to take care of them?

Yes I would take the fixes as well for the drivers

-- 
~Vinod