[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230508110817.GW14287@atomide.com>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 14:08:17 +0300
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] serial: 8250: omap: Fix freeing of resources on
failed register
* Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com> [230508 09:55]:
> An unrelated comment to the patch itself, there seems to be somewhat
> handwavy and possibly wrong calculation for the pm qos latency. First of
> all, I think it would want something based on port->frame_time, and I'm
> far from convinced that 64 is right as it matches FIFO size which doesn't
> feel correct for a wakeup related time.
Thanks for spotting it, good point. I'll take a look at that in a separate
patch.
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists