[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <305fcc15-0aec-8f9d-f98a-1e8966418543@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 11:07:21 -0400
From: Ross Philipson <ross.philipson@...cle.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
dpsmith@...rtussolutions.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com, ardb@...nel.org, mjg59@...f.ucam.org,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, luto@...capital.net,
nivedita@...m.mit.edu, kanth.ghatraju@...cle.com,
trenchboot-devel@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 12/14] x86: Secure Launch late initcall platform module
On 5/5/23 15:42, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 02:50:21PM +0000, Ross Philipson wrote:
>> From: "Daniel P. Smith" <dpsmith@...rtussolutions.com>
>>
>> The Secure Launch platform module is a late init module. During the
>> init call, the TPM event log is read and measurements taken in the
>> early boot stub code are located. These measurements are extended
>> into the TPM PCRs using the mainline TPM kernel driver.
>>
>> The platform module also registers the securityfs nodes to allow
>> access to TXT register fields on Intel along with the fetching of
>> and writing events to the late launch TPM log.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Smith <dpsmith@...rtussolutions.com>
>> Signed-off-by: garnetgrimm <grimmg@...fosec.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ross Philipson <ross.philipson@...cle.com>
>
> Hi Ross,
>
> a few more items from my side.
>
> ...
>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/slmodule.c b/arch/x86/kernel/slmodule.c
>
> ...
>
>> +/*
>> + * Securityfs exposure
>> + */
>> +struct memfile {
>> + char *name;
>> + void *addr;
>> + size_t size;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct memfile sl_evtlog = {"eventlog", 0, 0};
>
> I don't think the 0 fields are necessary above, memset will zero
> any fields not explicitly set. But if you want to go that way, then
> I think the first one should be NULL, as the addr field is a pointer.
>
>> +static void *txt_heap;
>> +static struct txt_heap_event_log_pointer2_1_element __iomem *evtlog20;
>> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(sl_evt_log_mutex);
>
>> +static ssize_t sl_evtlog_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
>> + size_t count, loff_t *pos)
>> +{
>> + ssize_t size;
>> +
>> + if (!sl_evtlog.addr)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&sl_evt_log_mutex);
>> + size = simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, pos, sl_evtlog.addr,
>> + sl_evtlog.size);
>> + mutex_unlock(&sl_evt_log_mutex);
>> +
>> + return size;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t sl_evtlog_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
>> + size_t datalen, loff_t *ppos)
>
> nit: the line above doesn't align to the '(' on the line before that.
>
>> +{
>> + ssize_t result;
>> + char *data;
>> +
>> + if (!sl_evtlog.addr)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + /* No partial writes. */
>> + result = -EINVAL;
>> + if (*ppos != 0)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + data = memdup_user(buf, datalen);
>> + if (IS_ERR(data)) {
>> + result = PTR_ERR(data);
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&sl_evt_log_mutex);
>> + if (evtlog20)
>> + result = tpm20_log_event(evtlog20, sl_evtlog.addr,
>> + sl_evtlog.size, datalen, data);
>
> Sparse says that the type of the first argument of tmp20_log_event is:
>
> struct txt_heap_event_log_pointer2_1_element *
>
> However, the type of evtlog20 is:
>
> struct txt_heap_event_log_pointer2_1_element __iomem *
I have to look into what is going on here. The TXT heap is just a memory
range not IO space. I will track this down.
As to all the rest of your comments here, I will fix them.
Thanks
Ross
>
>> + else
>> + result = tpm12_log_event(sl_evtlog.addr, sl_evtlog.size,
>> + datalen, data);
>> + mutex_unlock(&sl_evt_log_mutex);
>> +
>> + kfree(data);
>> +out:
>> + return result;
>> +}
>
> ...
>
>> +static long slaunch_expose_securityfs(void)
>> +{
>> + long ret = 0;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + slaunch_dir = securityfs_create_dir("slaunch", NULL);
>> + if (IS_ERR(slaunch_dir))
>> + return PTR_ERR(slaunch_dir);
>> +
>> + if (slaunch_get_flags() & SL_FLAG_ARCH_TXT) {
>> + txt_dir = securityfs_create_dir("txt", slaunch_dir);
>> + if (IS_ERR(txt_dir)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(txt_dir);
>> + goto remove_slaunch;
>> + }
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sl_txt_files); i++) {
>> + txt_entries[i] = securityfs_create_file(
>> + sl_txt_files[i].name, 0440,
>> + txt_dir, NULL,
>> + sl_txt_files[i].fops);
>> + if (IS_ERR(txt_entries[i])) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(txt_entries[i]);
>> + goto remove_files;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>
> nit: no blank line here.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (sl_evtlog.addr > 0) {
>
> addr is a pointer. So perhaps:
>
> if (sl_evtlog.addr) {
>
>> + event_file = securityfs_create_file(
>> + sl_evtlog.name, 0440,
>> + slaunch_dir, NULL,
>> + &sl_evtlog_ops);
>> + if (IS_ERR(event_file)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(event_file);
>> + goto remove_files;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +remove_files:
>> + if (slaunch_get_flags() & SL_FLAG_ARCH_TXT) {
>> + while (--i >= 0)
>> + securityfs_remove(txt_entries[i]);
>> + securityfs_remove(txt_dir);
>> + }
>> +remove_slaunch:
>> + securityfs_remove(slaunch_dir);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>
> ...
>
>> +static void slaunch_intel_evtlog(void __iomem *txt)
>> +{
>> + struct slr_entry_log_info *log_info;
>> + struct txt_os_mle_data *params;
>> + struct slr_table *slrt;
>> + void *os_sinit_data;
>> + u64 base, size;
>> +
>> + memcpy_fromio(&base, txt + TXT_CR_HEAP_BASE, sizeof(base));
>> + memcpy_fromio(&size, txt + TXT_CR_HEAP_SIZE, sizeof(size));
>> +
>> + /* now map TXT heap */
>> + txt_heap = memremap(base, size, MEMREMAP_WB);
>> + if (!txt_heap)
>> + slaunch_txt_reset(txt,
>> + "Error failed to memremap TXT heap\n",
>> + SL_ERROR_HEAP_MAP);
>
> nit: These lines are not aligned to the opening '('
>
>> +
>> + params = (struct txt_os_mle_data *)txt_os_mle_data_start(txt_heap);
>> +
>> + /* Get the SLRT and remap it */
>> + slrt = memremap(params->slrt, sizeof(*slrt), MEMREMAP_WB);
>> + if (!slrt)
>> + slaunch_txt_reset(txt,
>> + "Error failed to memremap SLR Table\n",
>> + SL_ERROR_SLRT_MAP);
>> + size = slrt->size;
>> + memunmap(slrt);
>> +
>> + slrt = memremap(params->slrt, size, MEMREMAP_WB);
>> + if (!slrt)
>> + slaunch_txt_reset(txt,
>> + "Error failed to memremap SLR Table\n",
>> + SL_ERROR_SLRT_MAP);
>> +
>> + log_info = (struct slr_entry_log_info *)
>> + slr_next_entry_by_tag(slrt, NULL, SLR_ENTRY_LOG_INFO);
>> + if (!log_info)
>> + slaunch_txt_reset(txt,
>> + "Error failed to memremap SLR Table\n",
>> + SL_ERROR_SLRT_MISSING_ENTRY);
>> +
>> + sl_evtlog.size = log_info->size;
>> + sl_evtlog.addr = memremap(log_info->addr, log_info->size,
>> + MEMREMAP_WB);
>> + if (!sl_evtlog.addr)
>> + slaunch_txt_reset(txt,
>> + "Error failed to memremap TPM event log\n",
>> + SL_ERROR_EVENTLOG_MAP);
>> +
>> + memunmap(slrt);
>> +
>> + /* Determine if this is TPM 1.2 or 2.0 event log */
>> + if (memcmp(sl_evtlog.addr + sizeof(struct tcg_pcr_event),
>> + TCG_SPECID_SIG, sizeof(TCG_SPECID_SIG)))
>> + return; /* looks like it is not 2.0 */
>> +
>> + /* For TPM 2.0 logs, the extended heap element must be located */
>> + os_sinit_data = txt_os_sinit_data_start(txt_heap);
>> +
>
> The return type of tmp20_find_lot2_1_element() is:
>
> struct txt_heap_event_log_pointer2_1_element *
>
> However, the type of evtlog20 is:
>
> struct txt_heap_event_log_pointer2_1_element __iomem *
>
>> + evtlog20 = tpm20_find_log2_1_element(os_sinit_data);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If this fails, things are in really bad shape. Any attempt to write
>> + * events to the log will fail.
>> + */
>> + if (!evtlog20)
>> + slaunch_txt_reset(txt,
>> + "Error failed to find TPM20 event log element\n",
>> + SL_ERROR_TPM_INVALID_LOG20);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void slaunch_tpm20_extend_event(struct tpm_chip *tpm, void __iomem *txt,
>> + struct tcg_pcr_event2_head *event)
>> +{
>> + u16 *alg_id_field = (u16 *)((u8 *)event +
>> + sizeof(struct tcg_pcr_event2_head));
>> + struct tpm_digest *digests;
>> + u8 *dptr;
>> + int ret;
>> + u32 i, j;
>> +
>> + digests = kcalloc(tpm->nr_allocated_banks, sizeof(*digests),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!digests)
>> + slaunch_txt_reset(txt,
>> + "Failed to allocate array of digests\n",
>> + SL_ERROR_GENERIC);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < tpm->nr_allocated_banks; i++)
>> + digests[i].alg_id = tpm->allocated_banks[i].alg_id;
>> +
>> +
>
> nit: one blank line is enough.
>
>> + /* Early SL code ensured there was a max count of 2 digests */
>> + for (i = 0; i < event->count; i++) {
>> + dptr = (u8 *)alg_id_field + sizeof(u16);
>> +
>> + for (j = 0; j < tpm->nr_allocated_banks; j++) {
>> + if (digests[j].alg_id != *alg_id_field)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + switch (digests[j].alg_id) {
>> + case TPM_ALG_SHA256:
>> + memcpy(&digests[j].digest[0], dptr,
>> + SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE);
>> + alg_id_field = (u16 *)((u8 *)alg_id_field +
>> + SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE + sizeof(u16));
>> + break;
>> + case TPM_ALG_SHA1:
>> + memcpy(&digests[j].digest[0], dptr,
>> + SHA1_DIGEST_SIZE);
>> + alg_id_field = (u16 *)((u8 *)alg_id_field +
>> + SHA1_DIGEST_SIZE + sizeof(u16));
>> + default:
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = tpm_pcr_extend(tpm, event->pcr_idx, digests);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + pr_err("Error extending TPM20 PCR, result: %d\n", ret);
>> + slaunch_txt_reset(txt,
>> + "Failed to extend TPM20 PCR\n",
>> + SL_ERROR_TPM_EXTEND);
>> + }
>> +
>> + kfree(digests);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void slaunch_tpm20_extend(struct tpm_chip *tpm, void __iomem *txt)
>> +{
>> + struct tcg_pcr_event *event_header;
>> + struct tcg_pcr_event2_head *event;
>> + int start = 0, end = 0, size;
>> +
>> + event_header = (struct tcg_pcr_event *)(sl_evtlog.addr +
>> + evtlog20->first_record_offset);
>
> Sparse says that evtlog20 shouldn't be dereferenced because it
> has a __iomem attribute.
>
>> +
>> + /* Skip first TPM 1.2 event to get to first TPM 2.0 event */
>> + event = (struct tcg_pcr_event2_head *)((u8 *)event_header +
>> + sizeof(struct tcg_pcr_event) +
>> + event_header->event_size);
>> +
>> + while ((void *)event < sl_evtlog.addr + evtlog20->next_record_offset) {
>
> Ditto.
>
>> + size = __calc_tpm2_event_size(event, event_header, false);
>> + if (!size)
>> + slaunch_txt_reset(txt,
>> + "TPM20 invalid event in event log\n",
>> + SL_ERROR_TPM_INVALID_EVENT);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Marker events indicate where the Secure Launch early stub
>> + * started and ended adding post launch events.
>> + */
>> + if (event->event_type == TXT_EVTYPE_SLAUNCH_END) {
>> + end = 1;
>> + break;
>> + } else if (event->event_type == TXT_EVTYPE_SLAUNCH_START) {
>> + start = 1;
>> + goto next;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (start)
>> + slaunch_tpm20_extend_event(tpm, txt, event);
>> +
>> +next:
>> + event = (struct tcg_pcr_event2_head *)((u8 *)event + size);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!start || !end)
>> + slaunch_txt_reset(txt,
>> + "Missing start or end events for extending TPM20 PCRs\n",
>> + SL_ERROR_TPM_EXTEND);
>> +}
>
> ...
>
>> +static void slaunch_pcr_extend(void __iomem *txt)
>> +{
>> + struct tpm_chip *tpm;
>> +
>> + tpm = tpm_default_chip();
>> + if (!tpm)
>> + slaunch_txt_reset(txt,
>> + "Could not get default TPM chip\n",
>> + SL_ERROR_TPM_INIT);
>> + if (evtlog20)
>> + slaunch_tpm20_extend(tpm, txt);
>> + else
>> + slaunch_tpm12_extend(tpm, txt);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __init slaunch_module_init(void)
>> +{
>> + void __iomem *txt;
>> +
>> + /* Check to see if Secure Launch happened */
>> + if ((slaunch_get_flags() & (SL_FLAG_ACTIVE|SL_FLAG_ARCH_TXT)) !=
>> + (SL_FLAG_ACTIVE|SL_FLAG_ARCH_TXT))
>
> nit: spaces around '|'
> Likewise elsewhere in this patch.
>
>
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + txt = ioremap(TXT_PRIV_CONFIG_REGS_BASE, TXT_NR_CONFIG_PAGES *
>> + PAGE_SIZE);
>> + if (!txt)
>> + panic("Error ioremap of TXT priv registers\n");
>> +
>> + /* Only Intel TXT is supported at this point */
>> + slaunch_intel_evtlog(txt);
>> +
>> + slaunch_pcr_extend(txt);
>> +
>> + iounmap(txt);
>> +
>> + return slaunch_expose_securityfs();
>> +}
>
> ...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists