[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZFrR2XEuGWpZyJfh@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 20:06:01 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu: Add Kconfig help text for IOMMU_SVA
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 10:17:53AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> That said, the arm-smmu-v3-sva.c code clearly *also* uses pasid,
> except it seems to really want to call it "ssid".
This code is incorrect.. It is using the mm->pasid to try to deliver
an invalidation, but our new design does not restrict the userspace to
a single PASID, thus it will fail to properly synchronize the ATC in
some degenerate cases. In general the driver needs to be able to go
over a list of PASIDs that the domains are linked to and replicate
invalidations (of any sort) to the whole list.
It is still a WIP to make this driver implement the driver contract
for PASID logic properly.
> Now, "SSID" is a completely horrible name, as I immediately realized
> when I tried to google for it. So arm64 is just wrong, and we're most
> definitely continuing to call it PASID.
Yes, PASID comes from PCIe so we are using that.
> I'd lean towards just "CONFIG_MM_PASID" or something, but at some
> point this is bikeshedding, and I don't know about any possible
> non-iommu direct uses?
I don't think there is any other use, IOMMU should be the only
consumer of PASID, so it is a fine name as well.
Thanks,
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists