[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZFoXlEJ4l9SZjSEZ@corigine.com>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 11:51:16 +0200
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Lorenz Brun <lorenz@...n.one>
Cc: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: log clock enable errors
On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 11:40:35PM +0200, Lorenz Brun wrote:
> Currently errors in clk_prepare_enable are silently swallowed.
> Add a log stating which clock failed to be enabled and what the error
> code was.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenz Brun <lorenz@...n.one>
Hi Lorenz,
I think this would be targeted at net-next, and thus that should be noted
in the subject.
[PATCH net-next] ...
Link: https://kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> index e14050e17862..ca66a573cfcb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> @@ -3445,8 +3445,10 @@ static int mtk_clk_enable(struct mtk_eth *eth)
>
> for (clk = 0; clk < MTK_CLK_MAX ; clk++) {
> ret = clk_prepare_enable(eth->clks[clk]);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(eth->dev, "enabling clock %s failed with error %d\n", mtk_clks_source_name[clk], ret);
I see that some error logs are generated by clk_prepare_enable().
Is it common practice to also log in the caller, as you are doing above?
(Genuine question, I don't know.)
> goto err_disable_clks;
> + }
> }
>
> return 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists