[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZFou1SdT8SQaqpQu@FVFF77S0Q05N>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 12:30:29 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM/arm64: Mark all accessor functions inline
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 06:05:17PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch series adds missing "inline" keywords to the few perf
> accessors that lack them.
Will, I assume that you'll pick these up as a cleanup/fix.
Thanks,
Mark.
> BTW, I tried converting my local timing code to the new unified system.
> This works fine on arm64, but broke on arm32. Is read_pmccntr()
> supposed to work on arm32? I get an undefined instruction exception on
> Cortex A15 and A9. Before, my custom code used "mrc p15, 0, %0, c9,
> c13, 0" (as is also used in arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c), for which
> there is no accessor yet.
>
> Thanks for your comments!
>
> Geert Uytterhoeven (2):
> ARM: perf: Mark all accessor functions inline
> arm64: perf: Mark all accessor functions inline
>
> arch/arm/include/asm/arm_pmuv3.h | 6 +++---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/arm_pmuv3.h | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists