[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <168424545094.607408.9407141334580132518.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 16:14:40 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: kernel-team@...roid.com, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM/arm64: Mark all accessor functions inline
On Mon, 8 May 2023 18:05:17 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch series adds missing "inline" keywords to the few perf
> accessors that lack them.
>
> BTW, I tried converting my local timing code to the new unified system.
> This works fine on arm64, but broke on arm32. Is read_pmccntr()
> supposed to work on arm32? I get an undefined instruction exception on
> Cortex A15 and A9. Before, my custom code used "mrc p15, 0, %0, c9,
> c13, 0" (as is also used in arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c), for which
> there is no accessor yet.
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/fixes), thanks!
[1/2] ARM: perf: Mark all accessor functions inline
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/68e3f61eb9f5
[2/2] arm64: perf: Mark all accessor functions inline
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/3bc879e355da
Cheers,
--
Will
https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev
Powered by blists - more mailing lists