linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM/arm64: Mark all accessor functions inline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 16 May 2023 16:14:40 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     kernel-team@...roid.com, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM/arm64: Mark all accessor functions inline

On Mon, 8 May 2023 18:05:17 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> 	Hi all,
> 
> This patch series adds missing "inline" keywords to the few perf
> accessors that lack them.
> 
> BTW, I tried converting my local timing code to the new unified system.
> This works fine on arm64, but broke on arm32.  Is read_pmccntr()
> supposed to work on arm32? I get an undefined instruction exception on
> Cortex A15 and A9.  Before, my custom code used "mrc p15, 0, %0, c9,
> c13, 0" (as is also used in arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c), for which
> there is no accessor yet.
> 
> [...]

Applied to arm64 (for-next/fixes), thanks!

[1/2] ARM: perf: Mark all accessor functions inline
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/68e3f61eb9f5
[2/2] arm64: perf: Mark all accessor functions inline
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/3bc879e355da

Cheers,
-- 
Will

https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev